Could post-quantum transaction signatures make a hardware wallet too slow?

Some post-quantum schemes have larger signatures or different memory and computation requirements. The impact depends on algorithm, hardware and protocol design rather than a universal slowdown.

The answer

Some post-quantum schemes have larger signatures or different memory and computation requirements. The impact depends on algorithm, hardware and protocol design rather than a universal slowdown.

What to do next

Look for measured signing time, memory usage and transaction-byte benchmarks on the actual device.

USEFUL TOOL OR DOCUMENTATION

NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography resources

This resource helps with the question, but is not presented as a commissionable partner.

Visit NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography resources ↗Useful research or product resource; no affiliate status assumed.
RELATED PRODUCT OR SERVICE

Trezor hardware wallet

A current-generation hardware wallet for managing keys; it does not make Bitcoin or Ethereum quantum-resistant or resolve a future protocol migration.

Explore Trezor hardware wallet ↗Official website; affiliate programme available to apply for. No tracked link or partner approval yet.

Related crypto questions

More guides