Interactive Brokers
We select Interactive Brokers for global operating history and established brokerage infrastructure, not because it produces the highest client returns.
A brokerage has no meaningful universally comparable client investment-return record.
Why this is our Best choice
We select Interactive Brokers for global operating history and established brokerage infrastructure, not because it produces the highest client returns.
What you get
A brokerage has no meaningful universally comparable client investment-return record.
Other options worth knowing
It depends on your requirements and jurisdiction.
Tell us what type of investor you are, what you’re interested in and the services you need. The right brokerage or advisory provider depends on market access, costs, eligibility, location and preferred level of support.
What we consider
Country and eligibility, retail investor services, dealing and custody fees, account support, IPO access where appropriate, and the provider’s authorisation.
Questions people ask
What is the best choice for which brokerage has the best track record?
Our first choice is Interactive Brokers. We select Interactive Brokers for global operating history and established brokerage infrastructure, not because it produces the highest client returns.
Why was Interactive Brokers selected for which brokerage has the best track record?
We select Interactive Brokers for global operating history and established brokerage infrastructure, not because it produces the highest client returns.
What should buyers check about Interactive Brokers for which brokerage has the best track record?
A brokerage has no meaningful universally comparable client investment-return record.
What alternative is worth comparing for which brokerage has the best track record?
Saxo is the first alternative on our shortlist.